This page last updated: 23 February, 2007 18:51
Site Updates

 

SWAG Projects

Ridge and Furrow Survey

Nowadays, most of Worcestershire has been recorded by aerial photography, but we have been asked by WHEAS to continue ridge and furrow surveys at ground level.

New participants are taken out on their initial survey and introduced to the quite detailed paperwork. Photographs are taken where possible in order to provide additional detail, and for future reference should those fields be ploughed out.

The distribution of ridge and furrow is very variable over the county but there are surprising pockets of it on farms, which have been in the hands of one family for generations, where land has been used for stock or orchards. Some of it is in excellent condition but much is poor or seriously depleted, with some only visible in the hedgerows or from aerial photographs.

This is a long-term project and volunteers are always welcome. There are about 200 parishes in Worcestershire, of which around 20 have been recorded, so there is much of this very rewarding work to be done!

This type of work has long been important to SWAG, thus the SWAG logo depicts ridge and furrow systems.

An Introduction to Ridge and Furrow or Open-field Farming

Ridge and furrow field systems are generally believed to come from mediaeval times. The term describes a distinctive pattern of peaks and troughs in a field giving a rippled or corrugated appearance (although this should not be confused with modern field drainage), which is often best observed when the sun is low in the sky.

As one effect of the system was for water to drain via the furrows, the land in these troughs could become damp or boggy and where this is still the case today, it may be possible to see differences between the vegetation on the ridges and that in the furrows.

Such patterns in the landscape provide useful evidence of past use and can occasionally be instrumental in the identification of deserted mediaeval villages.

Forming the ridge-and-furrows

The ridge and furrow systems were often long and narrow, and this is often most evident from aerial photographs. The characteristic shape may have been due to the fact that the ploughs were very heavy and difficult to turn round, so it was in the farmers' interest to plough long furrows. While some ridge-and-furrows may be straight, some curve slightly in an elongated S-shape and it is believed that this was to allow room for the oxen to turn at the end of the furrow.

The plough itself was non-reversing, so it always pushed soil to the same side in relation to the direction of travel. If a plough pushed soil to, say, the left as the plough travelled forward, then when the plough was turned and the farmer came down the other side of the ridge, it could only push even more soil onto the ridge rather than form a new one on the other side.

These days, although farmers still plough their fields, they also use harrows and rollers and so the ridges and furrows are often levelled out over the course of a year, and it would be unusual to plough along exactly the same furrows year on year. But in the Middle Ages, as the villager-farmers were responsible for specific ridge-and-furrows, they would plough along the same furrows season after season. As a result, the ridges would become higher and the furrows deeper. This had an advantage in that as the ridge became higher, the surface area of the ridge would become larger over time, allowing more crops to be grown, and the deeper furrows might in some instances also form more distinct boundaries between different farmers' plots.

It would also account for how, where the land was eventually turned over to pasture, these field systems have resisted weather erosion and are still visible centuries later.

Management

There are several ways that cultivation strips may have been used - one is with each being cultivated by a different family, or maybe a family would cultivate several strips in their entirety if they were sufficiently wealthy. Another possibility was for a family to cultivate a portion of each of several adjacent strips so rather than a long, narrow strip of land, they would be responsible for an area of land more recognisable as what we today would think of as a field. Often the entire open field would be given over to one crop, and different crops would be rotated over the years.

The move away from ridge-and-furrow farming

From the late Middle Ages onwards, the open field style of agriculture gradually began to give way to amalgamated plots and enclosures, and this resulted in increasing power for landowners. The move was not popular with everyone, and some of the practices employed were denounced by the Church and the government, eventually leading to the Inclosure Consolidation Act of 1801. As mechanisation was introduced to farming the open field system all but disappeared but there still remain communually managed open filed systems in continental Europe, the practice having been exported over time.

Imperial land measures

It is claimed by some that Imperial measures on the land were derived from open-field farming methods. A ploughman's stick used to prod the oxen was known as a rod, pole or perch, and was five-and-a-half yards long. Laying the pole four times across the field came to 22 yards (a chain); laying the pole 40 times down the field came to 220 yards (a farrowlength, furrowlength or furlong). The area so formed, 4840 square yards, was an acre and was considered the area a plough team could reasonably plough in a day.

More on ridge and furrow on the Internet
 

 

Back to previous

Home

Diary

Projects

Fieldwork

Selected Finds

Past Visits

Opportunities in Archaeology

How to Join SWAG

Contact Us

Further Sources of Information

 

Back to Previous   |  Top of Page   |   Contact Us  |   Disclaimer  |   Home Page

www.swag-online.org.uk

©2004-9 South Worcestershire Archaeological Group